7/25/2023 0 Comments Nytimes chinese![]() ![]() ![]() There was no question about whether to publish the story. ![]() The previous spring, Rosenstein himself had been so concerned about Trump’s erratic behavior that he had suggested secretly recording the president and even raised the possibility of invoking a constitutional mechanism contained in the Twenty-Fifth Amendment that had never been used, to declare Trump unfit and remove him from office. Rosenstein, the second-highest-ranking official in the Justice Department, who had assumed oversight of the investigation when the attorney general recused himself.Īfter months of careful reporting, two reporters in the Washington bureau of the Times, Adam Goldman and Michael Schmidt, uncovered a startling story. They were also convinced that the last safeguard against the president’s relentless efforts to undermine the investigation was Rod J. Many of the president’s critics believed that the investigation would force the removal of a man they regarded as unfit to lead the nation. Even after years of watching these traditions come under intensifying pressure from the internet and social media, I was struck by how frontally the old journalistic model was being challenged by the dynamics of covering a new president unconstrained by precedent and social norms-sometimes even reality itself.Īt the time, the country was waiting for the results of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election on behalf of Donald Trump’s campaign. I had spent my career until then as a reporter and editor steeped in the methods, values, and stylistic quirks of traditional journalism, covering small towns for the Providence Journal and local government for the Portland Oregonian before joining the Times. It was the fall of 2018, my first year as publisher of the New York Times. But I can pinpoint the moment when I realized how contested the very idea of journalistic independence had become. Email us your thoughts at long as independent journalism has existed, it has angered people who want stories told their way or not at all. This essay, from the publisher of the New York Times, and the chairman of the New York Times company, is the latest in that ongoing conversation. In recent years, CJR has served as a forum for that discussion, through numerous pieces, and even a conference, last fall, exploring approaches to the question. The debate around “objectivity”-if that’s even the right word, anymore-has become among the most contested in journalism. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |